In offering professional services, it is essential for actuaries (as financial scientists) to follow  evidence. We must interpret all the evidence available as experts (like  Gil Grissom or Nikki Alexander) as, otherwise, we are contributing very  little indeed.

Interpretation is subjective, not objective. There is nothing wrong with subjectivity, so long as the actuary retains independence, rather than merely subscribing to groupthink. One must follow all of the evidence available and provide fully cogent  explanations, appropriately phrased for communicating with all stakeholders.

Different stakeholders need to be enabled to understand the potential consequences so that appropriate plans can be  made. This is most likely to be achieved by showing a range of potential outcomes rather than just one scalar result.